Thursday, September 18, 2014
Text Size

New risks seen in court’s native land ruling

Calgary analyst says Supreme Court decision clarifies who can oppose projects

By Dan Healing, Calgary Herald

CALGARY — A Supreme Court decision on B.C. native land titles creates new risks for a resource sector already struggling to deal with aboriginal opposition, industry observers said Thursday.

The most positive aspect of the ruling — which gives bands with unresolved land claims the right to legal title to traditional lands regularly used for hunting, fishing and other activities — is that it offers clarity on what has been a murky issue, they added.

Alex Ferguson, vice-president of policy and direction for the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, said the group which represents oil and gas companies is still digesting the 80-page decision.

“Our view is, at the surface, it’s a good piece of clarity to add to the long-standing evolution of these issues,” he said, noting there may be “rub points” that emerge as the ruling is interpreted.

He said it’s difficult to say how the decision and its “strength-of-claim” implications will affect the $6.5-billion Northern Gateway pipeline proposed by Enbridge Inc. (given federal approval last week) or the proposed $5.4-billion expansion of Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain pipeline.

Both are designed to carry oil from Alberta to the West Coast and both face fierce opposition from native groups as well as federal opposition parties and provincial politicians.

In a research report Thursday, analyst Steven Paget of FirstEnergy Capital said the ruling means more native communities will be able to claim standing to oppose pipelines but at least the proponents will know which groups they must negotiate with.

“We believe this decision has both positive and negative implications for pipeline projects,” he wrote, noting it appears to give standing to almost all First Nations with claims to territories in northern B.C., where there are few or no treaties.

He pointed out that the ruling doesn’t greatly help or hinder the pipelines because many First Nations that oppose the projects, especially on the coast, can claim long-term continuous settlement and therefore would have been granted standing anyway in a legal challenge.

In the Supreme Court decision released Thursday, Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin wrote that aboriginal title is not absolute and development can go ahead if there is either the consent of the First Nation or if the government can prove need and attends to its fiduciary responsibility to the aboriginal group.

Members of the Xeni Gwet’in and Tsilhqot’in First Nations appealed to the Supreme Court after the B.C. Court of Appeal issued a ruling that restricted its aboriginal title to sites where the band has had an “intensive presence.”

The Supreme Court said aboriginal title “is not confined to specific sites of settlement but extends to tracts of land that were regularly used for hunting, fishing or otherwise exploiting resources and over which the group exercised effective control at the time of assertion of European sovereignty.”

Sharon Mascher, a law professor at the University of Calgary, said the ruling has enormous implications not only for future projects but also for ones that have already been approved or started construction.

She pointed to a paragraph in the decision that says if a band acquires title to land on which development has already been approved, “it may be necessary for the Crown to reassess prior conduct in light of the new reality in order to faithfully discharge its fiduciary duty to the title-holding group.”

The government might have to retroactively cancel permission for a project if it was approved without consent prior to aboriginal title being established, the paragraph adds. Furthermore, legislation enacted before title is established may also be “rendered inapplicable” if it infringes on aboriginal title.

“That means that everybody needs to think very, very carefully about what they’re doing, not just post approval of title but also in light of prior conduct leading up to an assessment of title,” said Mascher.

CAPP’s Ferguson agreed the paragraph is troubling.

“Of course. And at risk will be those projects that weren’t properly consultative, it’s quite clear in the decision on that, too ...,” he said.

“That hasn’t changed. If you’ve gone out and done a project where you just frankly have not followed those processes and governments have not followed and met their obligations, well, those projects would be at risk.”

Aboriginal groups already have a great deal of leverage when negotiating socio-economic agreements with resource companies, Ferguson said when asked if the ruling boosts their ability to negotiate rich benefits in return for supporting projects.

Paget said the Supreme Court’s confirmation of the government’s right to allow resource projects if there is a compelling public interest is important because having coastal access for oil exports clears that hurdle.

“This part of the decision could be an avenue for Gateway or Trans Mountain to proceed, although we expect there would be further court cases where Enbridge or Kinder Morgan would be forced to prove that their pipelines were in the public interest,” he wrote.

He said he will continue to leave the Northern Gateway project out of his calculations for future Enbridge earnings as it faces too many obstacles. The company has not yet officially sanctioned the project.

In a morning news conference to announce forestry project funding in Calgary, Natural Resources Minister Greg Rickford said the federal government is reviewing the ruling.

“We ultimately believe the best way to resolve outstanding aboriginal rights and title claims is through negotiated treaty settlements,” he said.

He refused comment on how the decision might affect the Northern Gateway pipeline.

Whatever Trevor

Dis is Trevor.

Education & Training

Blast from the past: FP archive

When is Consultation, Consultation?

Ovide Mercredi

National Chief – AFN

During a Treaty Roundtable meeting of the Alberta Chiefs, I took note of a federal government document outlining their strategy to define and ultimately impose their own form of self-government. Read more...

Letting go of residential schools

by Gilbert Oskaboose, Nov 1993 First Perspective

There is a lot of "unfinished business" in Indian Country. Garbage that we as a people have never really dealt with. Chief among them is the whole issue of those infamous residential schools and their impact on people. Read more...


obidiah picture

ANALYSIS - Bill Gallagher

gallagher picture

Under the Northern Sky by Xavier Kataquapit

Under the Northern Sky by Xavier Kataquapit


First Nations Cultural Interpreter PM – 02 Riding Mountain National Park Seasonal Indeterminate

(May to October) From $54,543 to $58,764

Closing Sept. 19, 2014

Read More

Regional Media Officer– Temp (Until Nov 2015) –F/T Position

Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition / NDP Research Office

Location:131 Queen Street, Suite 10-02, Ottawa, ON


Communicate regularly with regional media outlets (community newspapers, radio stations, student media, ethnic media, etc.) to propose ideas for interviews and opinion content Read more...

Canadian Chamber of Commerce Aboriginal Workforce Report

The Canadian Chamber of Commerce released a report that highlights initiatives to improve the workforce participation of Aboriginal peoples. 

Opportunity Found: Improving the Participation of Aboriginal Peoples in Canada’s Workforce (December 2013)  

click image to download report

Tue Sep 23 @ 3:00PM - 04:15PM
FNHMA National Conference 2014
Sun Oct 05 @ 9:00AM - 05:00PM
INIHKD & Manitoba NEAHR Conference 2014


September 2014
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4

Current Video

RIP Percy Tuesday


Thanks to Althea Guiboche for allowing The First Perspective to share her video taken at the Manitowapow book launch at McNally Robinson. 

Percey sings Freddy Fender's "Wasted Days and Wasted Nights" and people join in to harmonize. 

Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO): The Washington Redskins