Monday, September 15, 2014
Text Size

The AFN: A story of too many chiefs and too few voters

Globe editorial

The Globe and Mail

This December, native leaders from across the country will gather in Winnipeg to elect a new national chief for the Assembly of First Nations. The winner will replace Shawn Atleo, who resigned last May, under pressure from a group of chiefs who opposed his support of federal reforms aimed at fixing the abysmal state of native education. The job of national chief is high-profile and comes with enormous pressure. And, as the circumstances of Mr. Atleo’s sudden departure and its aftermath perfectly illustrate, the big title comes with very little real power.

There was nothing wrong with Bill C-33, which Mr. Atleo and Ottawa championed. It would have gone a long way toward providing more stable and substantial funding for on-reserve schools, which could have brightened prospects for native youth. Nor was there anything wrong with Mr. Atleo himself. The 47-year-old, university-educated hereditary chief from Vancouver Island was exactly the kind of person the AFN needed. He is cool-headed, has his ear to the ground and, unlike some of his predecessors, was willing to work with both Ottawa and business to tackle some of the most intransigent problems plaguing his people: soaring high-school dropout rates, stubborn poverty and rampant unemployment.

His resignation is a symptom of a deep and serious problem: the inherent dysfunction of the AFN itself. It is broken; its structure, modelled after the UN General Assembly, renders it irrelevant. The national chief is a lot like the UN’s secretary-general – he has a bully pulpit but power rests with the organization’s member states. More than new elections or a new leader, the AFN needs to ask itself tough questions about how it might better serve the interests of registered or status Indians.

Right now, the AFN serves the interests of 634 member chiefs. They are the only ones who vote for the national chief. He isn’t the democratically elected leader of a people – or even a group of peoples. He’s the emissary of the chiefs. And that means the AFN isn’t a political organization. It’s a lobby group – highly bureaucratic and funded by Ottawa. The role of the national chief is a study in contradictions. According to the AFN’s Charter: “The National Chief shall have no inherent political authority,” yet has “a political role and is the primary spokesperson of the Assembly of First Nations.”

The debacle of the dead-in-the-water First Nations Control of First Nations Education Act shows the impossibility any national chief finds himself in. Mr. Atleo was elected not once, but twice, with a mandate to fix on-reserve schools. He bargained hard and in good faith with Ottawa to secure funding provisions that had been left out of early drafts of Bill C-33. He thought he had the full backing of the chiefs, and he did – until he didn’t. He couldn’t hold the deal together, and Bill C-33 was put on ice. The chiefs’ fickleness is partly to blame, but the AFN’s structure gave Mr. Atleo no authority to check it. Ottawa is not blameless either. The feds thought they had a negotiating partner; they should have known he was only a secretary-general. Mr. Atleo, humiliated, had no choice but to resign.

Travel back in time to when the organization was first formed, to replace the National Indian Brotherhood. Band council chiefs were at odds with regional leaders. It was impossible for 634 band councils to negotiate with Ottawa. Why not create an organization that would be “the one and only voice of Indian People in Canada”? In 1982, the AFN was born.

Problems were apparent from the start: “The Chiefs in Assembly will have some tough decisions to make if they want a strengthened and more effective organization of individual First Nations as opposed to an organization of organizations.” Those were the words of Ernie Benedict, chairman of a commission the AFN created in 1983 to address its structural issues. Its recommendations essentially went nowhere. So have subsequent efforts over the past 30 years. That’s because the chiefs who control the AFN have a vested interest in maintaining their power by upholding the status quo.

On the upside, there is hardly a lack of ideas of how to change. One is to allow all aboriginal people to vote in AFN elections, not just chiefs. The goal would be to empower the people to decide who can best lobby for them. The national chief would have a strong mandate and be accountable to hundreds of thousands of aboriginal voters, not just the chiefs.

Another thought would be to splinter the AFN into smaller groups, more closely aligned with First Nations instead of band councils. Regionalized lobby groups would have greater legitimacy to speak to the needs of their people.

Some want to do away with the AFN altogether, abandoning the idea of a lobby group in favour of a protest movement, building on Idle No More. This concept comes from a sense of frustration that the AFN’s executive has grown too cozy with Ottawa, and too reliant on funding.

But a pure protest movement would have little clout at a time when First Nations are actually well positioned to make some real strides. Yes, there is unresolved work around First Nations education, among other things. But there is also a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision that has clarified crucial First Nations economic rights over territories that are the subject of unresolved land claims. Companies are under pressure to “engage with aboriginal groups.” Governments too. They need a credible national organization to engage with. Right now, the AFN doesn’t cut it.

After their recent meeting in Halifax, the chiefs, to their credit, recognized that AFN’s structure needed review.

That has to mean real change. Without meaningful reform, the AFN will continue its slide into irrelevance.

just more scams from a color party scams,,,,
they want a puppet to control....

look your chief is your vote,,,,,, now to get an admin for the file a citizen complaint system is the admin department IQ

so the vote needs to come from chiefs or it wont work and you get a Harper at the helm with a public vote.....and your chief means nothing... a puppet of the crown....
every chief is granted the right to bring in someone to be the new admin....

IQ its the direction flow of the complaint files that are served to the chiefs to vote on and teach you about it.... verdict files and what is about to be voted on....
its just an admin yet you need a good one....IQ media face... the consent to speak for the all by checks and balance.... foreign victors recording of the events good or bad...archives
admin.... the ship is run by who... the complaint files not the chiefs....admin will do what filter the complaints down for proper case files... for all the chiefs....

here is what I mean how many case files can the chiefs vote on in a year with quality review and for you to see and teach the verdic.... to the amount of complaint files coming in..... again all complaint files must pass the post.... so they get grouped and refined ....... so every complaint can move forward....
understand my words....
I care not who rules but the broken rules....

now why do you need to hang a chief from tree for treason
see you need a body of law.... sand box trial...
file the complaint in to hang a chief from tree for treason on the unborn... this will create a chain reaction into a new institution... body...
deliberate it you have a live chief on trial for treason on the unborn...
see here is what I mean you don't want division every time it comes to a vote....
its just an admin..... and everyone knows his duties.... will you fight if the wrong guy gets in thinking he will sell you out.....


his an admin.... admirations with duties to serve the chiefs the complaint all put out.... verdict respect it contest it with new complaint file... harper is a complaint yet what can he do but pass the puck as admin....
see admin can only do what respect the verdict file when speaking.... respect the complaint file when speaking...... launch a directive,,,,, and is granted to speak his view to who..... verdict file votes is the ruler and anyone can contest those files for a revote base on time and new info and view not seen... build your case network... admin helps you connect with others... filters down the complaint files....

to launch a directive is not done all the time its should be govern by complaint files.... something really bad happen and the chiefs need to work and see what's going on here...
a directive
even a directive file is a verdict file so you all get to know how many directives the admin has produce.... just like even the complaint files the author and its subs inputs the group...

so if you want to contest it start their to prove your case to get it to bubble back up for a verdict file vote..... its all about never ending education.... you all get a copy....

where is the need to fight who should be over what.... who is back stabbing who...

I just think it would be kinda funny deliberating and seeing news press on should the chief get hung from a tree or not base on the evidence of treason for selling out its citizens unborn rights...... for treason...

with harper at helm...
like I said express yet let things unfold...
how about this one admin gets elected and his first complaint file is to hang a chief on a tree for treason...

Whatever Trevor

Dis is Trevor.

Blast from the past: FP archive

When is Consultation, Consultation?

Ovide Mercredi

National Chief – AFN

During a Treaty Roundtable meeting of the Alberta Chiefs, I took note of a federal government document outlining their strategy to define and ultimately impose their own form of self-government. Read more...

Letting go of residential schools

by Gilbert Oskaboose, Nov 1993 First Perspective

There is a lot of "unfinished business" in Indian Country. Garbage that we as a people have never really dealt with. Chief among them is the whole issue of those infamous residential schools and their impact on people. Read more...


obidiah picture

ANALYSIS - Bill Gallagher

gallagher picture

Under the Northern Sky by Xavier Kataquapit

Under the Northern Sky by Xavier Kataquapit


First Nations Cultural Interpreter PM – 02 Riding Mountain National Park Seasonal Indeterminate

(May to October) From $54,543 to $58,764

Closing Sept. 19, 2014

Read More

Regional Media Officer– Temp (Until Nov 2015) –F/T Position

Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition / NDP Research Office

Location:131 Queen Street, Suite 10-02, Ottawa, ON


Communicate regularly with regional media outlets (community newspapers, radio stations, student media, ethnic media, etc.) to propose ideas for interviews and opinion content Read more...

Canadian Chamber of Commerce Aboriginal Workforce Report

The Canadian Chamber of Commerce released a report that highlights initiatives to improve the workforce participation of Aboriginal peoples. 

Opportunity Found: Improving the Participation of Aboriginal Peoples in Canada’s Workforce (December 2013)  

click image to download report

Tue Sep 23 @ 3:00PM - 04:15PM
FNHMA National Conference 2014
Sun Oct 05 @ 9:00AM - 05:00PM
INIHKD & Manitoba NEAHR Conference 2014


September 2014
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4

Current Video

RIP Percy Tuesday


Thanks to Althea Guiboche for allowing The First Perspective to share her video taken at the Manitowapow book launch at McNally Robinson. 

Percey sings Freddy Fender's "Wasted Days and Wasted Nights" and people join in to harmonize. 

Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO): The Washington Redskins